Sixth UNSG Report on R2P: International Assistance and the Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia

This is an excerpt from R2P IDEAS in Brief by Dr Noel M. Morada, Director of the Regional Diplomacy and Capacity Building program of the Asia Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect (AP R2P).

The UN Secretary General’s sixth report on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) since 2009 focuses on Pillar 2 (international assistance) and the role of the international community in encouraging and helping states to protect their populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. The report focuses on the three core elements of Pillar 2, namely, encouragement, capacity-building, and protection assistance and provides some examples of good practices at national, regional, and international levels. It also identifies a number of challenges to
the implementation of Pillar 2 and sets out several recommendations for advancing this important pillar. The Secretary General’s Report will be the topic of this year’s Informal Interactive Dialogue on R2P held by the UN General Assembly this month.

Since 2009, a number of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) member states participated in the annual dialogue on R2P, with four of its ten members—Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand—reflecting on the Secretary General’s Report in last year’s dialogue. For the first time, Southeast Asia will be represented among the Panelists in this year’s Interactive Dialogue as former ASEAN Secretary-General, Dr. Surin Pitsuwan, will address the General Assembly on this topic. Dr. Surin currently serves as Chair of the High Level Advisory Panel on the Responsibility to Protect. At the request of the Mr. Adama Dieng, Under-Secretary-General of the UN and Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide, the High Level Panel will present a report on the steps that ASEAN might take to mainstream R2P in Southeast at the United Nations on 9 September this year.

This policy brief highlights some important points in the Secretary-General’s Report on R2P and identifies a number of priority areas for international assistance that are relevant to ASEAN member states and that could contribute to capacity building at the national and regional levels. Specifically, it focuses on the need for continuing support for the promotion of human rights protection, conflict prevention, peace, and reconciliation; the creation of national architectures for mass atrocities prevention in ASEAN states; the need to deal with past atrocities; and the importance of inter-faith or communal dialogue.

Read the full brief here.

ASEAN and Prevention of Violence Against Women in Conflict and Humanitarian Situations

IMG_1881[1]The Asia Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, with the support of the Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, hosted a workshop on ASEAN and Prevention of Violence Against Women in Conflict and Humanitarian Situations in Jakarta on 20 August 2014. The event was attended by 48 leaders from the government sector, non-government organizations and international organizations from Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Singapore and Viet Nam. It was our honour to host Acting British Ambassador to Indonesia, ASEAN and Timor Leste, Rebecca Razavi, who gave the keynote address on the ‘Preventing Sexual Violence in Conflict Initiative’.

Below is an abbreviated Introduction to the Workshop by Sara Davies, AP R2P Program Director for Prevention of Mass Atrocities. The Introduction has been published in full as a Spotlight Brief at Asia Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect.

“It is my pleasure to have this opportunity to welcome such a distinguished audience to this Workshop on Prevention of Violence Against Women in Conflict and Humanitarian Situations, hosted by the Asia Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect and the Australian Government’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Today, we are attempting to address two ambitions.

First, to identify, document and highlight the important regional, national and local work that you – as governments and civil society organizations – have undertaken to protect populations from R2P crimes, which include widespread and systematic sexual and gender based violence.

Second, to explore ways of assisting ASEAN and individual members to fulfill their responsibility to eliminate violence against women. In particular, we are interested in exploring how the principle of the responsibility to protect might assist, what further initiatives may enable a deepening of engagement in this issue, what sorts of capacities still need to be built, and how the international community might support these efforts across Southeast Asia.

Our Centre is particularly focused on the prevention of mass atrocities. Prevention creates the best conditions for stability and prosperity, which enables populations to be protected effectively and inclusively.

We have long argued that the prevention of mass atrocity crimes requires engagement with the conditions that perpetuate gender inequality, women’s human rights violations and the disproportionate risk of atrocity crimes, specifically those that constitute sexual and gender based violence, which sees women and girls disproportionately targeted. It also demands that we pay attention to the empowerment of women as peacemakers, peacebuilders, and sources of protection.

We believe strongly that advocates of R2P should engage with and promote the prevention, protection, participation framework outlined by the Women Peace and Security Agenda, which was first passed as resolution 1325 by the United Nations Security Council in 2000, and successively in resolutions 1820, 1888, 1889, 1960, 2106 and 2122.

As a result, the promotion of dialogue and mutual understanding between the R2P principle and WPS agenda has become a core focus of the Centre’s work on the conditions for prevention of mass atrocities for four main reasons:

First, it is now well recognized that sexual and gender-based violence can constitute acts of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. At their most basic, R2P and WPS share important goals in common, not least, the elimination of these types of crimes.

Second, there is a strong explanatory relationship between endemic gender inequality and high rates of political violence and one-sided violence against civilians. As Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon observed in his 2013 R2P report on State Responsibility and Protection:

‘Gender discrimination and inequality increase underlying risks associated with sexual and gender-based violence, which can constitute genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity…Specific gender discrimination practices include the denial or inadequate protection of basic rights relating to physical security and the status of women, compulsory birth control and unequal access to services and property’.

Third, sexual and gendered violence are often the first types of mass atrocity crimes committed against populations to achieve political ends. These crimes can occur before conflict, after conflict and during conflict as Syria, Mali, Sri Lanka and recent tragedy in Iraq with the Yazidi population demonstrate. There is a history of gendered crimes being used as tools of political violence to achieve political aims. This continues today, but its role in fostering other crimes and violence conflict is not yet adequately understood. This is the focus of my own research with Prof. Jacqui True, in the Prevention of Sexual Violence in Asia Pacific Project.

Fourth, R2P and WPS share a common focus on prevention and in the development of international, regional, national and societal level tools to empower women and prevent mass atrocities (R2P – through appointment of government level R2P Focal Point and WPS – through development of NAPs). This means that there is opportunity to align the R2P principle and the WPS agenda on the targets and tools needed to prevent mass atrocity crimes, which – as stated by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon in his 2013 report – demands action to address structural gender inequality and gender discrimination.

Today we are interested in exploring the progress made by ASEAN member states in the promotion of the VAW Agenda and in how this may be extended through greater reference to WPS agenda in the Political-Security Community – the area with greatest focus (and responsibility) on populations at risk in situations of civil strife, conflict and humanitarian disasters. We want to explore how the WPS agenda might be advanced through the region’s Political-Security Community to ensure that the resilience built in ‘peaceful’ situations extends to situations characterized by conflict and humanitarian disasters – where there is disproportionate risk to women and girls.

I will make some final notes regarding areas where we see alignment across three areas – WPS, PSVI and VAW – in the ASEAN region.

ASEAN and WPS PowerPoint

First, with passage of Resolution 1325 in 2000 it was recognized that the maintenance of international peace and security depended upon women’s equal and full participation in the maintenance and promotion of peace and security. The ASEAN Political-Security Community has developed parallel to WPS and have made statements suggesting supportive of its goals but, thus far, ASEAN Member States have made few specific engagements relevant to 1325 in terms of taking both a whole-of-government and regional organization approach to incorporate WPS into political and security sectors. Of interest to us, the one area where we have seen significant ASEAN foreign ministry-led engagement in WPS has been the UK’s PSVI.

The PSVI, which we will hear more about next from UK FCO Acting Ambassador Rebecca Razavi, has been one of most important normative developments in foreign policy in recent years. There has been much focus on the UNGA Declaration of Commitment to End Sexual Violence in Conflict, and the recently, the International Protocol on Documentation and Investigation of Sexual Violence in Conflict.

Within this region, 8 ASEAN member states have committed to this Declaration. The Declaration calls upon states to legislate against and prosecute individuals for these crimes, have police and justice mechanisms in place to punish anyone for these crimes, and requests states and regional organizations to recognise and implement the WPS National Action Plans; as well as promote women’s full participation in all political, governance, and security structures.

The commitment of Indonesia, Philippines and East Timor Foreign Ministers, at the June 2014 Global Summit on PSVI, to serve as Champions of PSVI and promote the UNGA Declaration against Sexual Violence amongst the ASEAN membership is a further significant development. This public support provides an opportunity to sharpen attention on the participation, protection and prevention elements of the WPS agenda that is not present within the ASEAN Political-Security Community. The PSVI falls directly under the purview of the ASEAN Political-Security Community and may provide an opportunity to formalise inclusion of WPS agenda.

To date, we have identified a considerable gap in reporting on the work being done every day to protect people from these grave crimes. We focus a lot on the failure but give too little focus and attention on what works. This gap in knowledge exists not just in the area of WPS but across a number of areas of concern to R2P – in relation to asylum seekers and refugees, ethnic and religious minorities, children and other vulnerable populations. This workshop is the beginning, we hope, of a process of documenting the work you are doing which contributes to the goal of preventing atrocities and provides opportunities for participation and engagement that may inform future policy and programs.

As such, we are very keen to hear from you about what the priorities should be as we move forward to achieve the goals of WPS and R2P in our region.

A report detailing the event and recommendations from the participants will be available at the Asia Pacific Centre for Responsibility to Protect in late September.  The program for the event may be found here.

The Prevention of Atrocity Crimes in the ASEAN Region: The Role of Parliamentarians


Excerpt of Spotlight on R2P by Dr Noel M. Morada, Director (Regional), Asia Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect

The United Nations Office of the Special Adviser on Genocide Prevention (OSAPG) and the ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR) organized a seminar in Bangkok on 27-28 March 2014 on the role of parliamentarians in promoting mass atrocities in Southeast Asia.  The two-day meeting was attended by 14 current and former parliamentarians from Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar/Burma, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand along with specialists from the UN, Rutgers University, and the Asia Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect (AP R2P).  Sessions during the seminar included: 1) international legal framework for the punishment and prevention atrocity crimes; 2) socio-historical perspective in analyzing mass atrocity crimes; 3) strategies and policy options for the prevention of atrocity crimes; 4) international and regional human rights mechanisms; and 5) the role of parliamentarians in the prevention of mass atrocity crimes.  Noel Morada presented lectures on the R2P norm and the challenges and opportunities in the prevention of mass atrocity crimes in Southeast Asia.  In the second day of the meeting, participants also had a brainstorming session to outline priority issues that the APHR could focus on, including some concrete recommendations on how to operationalize R2P and mass atrocities prevention in the region. 

Neri Colmenares, a member of the House of Representatives of the Philippine legislature, presented the Inter-Parliamentary Union’s (IPU) Resolution on R2P (Enforcing the Responsibility to Protect: The Role of Parliament in Safeguarding Civilians’ Lives), which was adopted in its 128th session in Quito, Ecuador on 27 March 2013.  Among the relevant tools identified in the resolution that were highlighted in his presentation were the following:

  • Promote public education and awareness-raising in preventing genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and ethnic cleansing;
  • Use of social media to denounce acts of violence against women and children and to fight impunity;
  • Adopt laws and policies to protect women and children, to prevent and criminalize sexual violence, and to provide redress for victims in times of peace and conflict, including the implementation of UN Security Council resolution 1325;
  • Ensure that international treaties to which states are parties are incorporated in domestic laws, particularly those dealing with human rights and protection of civilians;
  • Adopt measures to respect rights of civilians caught in armed conflicts;
  • Take necessary measures in bringing states’ criminal and military law in accordance with international laws for protection of civilians in armed conflicts;
  • Use parliamentarians’ international network to promote the universal ratification of the Rome statute (International Criminal Court);
  • Encourage their respective governments to support the creation and effective functioning of early warning systems and response at the national, regional, and international levels;
  • Include funds in the state’s national budget for protection of populations from violence and ensure their safety; and
  • Assume responsibility in protecting the rights of refugees and their right to international protection, including fulfillment of their states’ obligations to protect refugees and asylum-seekers.  

Colmenares also pointed out that, apart from legislation or filing of bills in parliament, legislators also have two other important functions that are useful in promoting the prevention of mass atrocity crimes: to conduct investigation in-aid-of legislation and advocacy work.  For example, legislative investigations can be an effective tool in enforcing R2P by holding accountable the executive or cabinet if it fails to effectively implement laws on human rights protection; inquiring into mass atrocity crimes committed by law enforcement agents or the military; or ensuring the state’s compliance with international standards on human rights protection.  The advocacy functions of parliamentarians include promoting awareness and education among their constituents about human rights protection, access to justice, and rule of law; encouraging citizens to file complaints against impunity and human rights violations; and promoting the inclusion of human rights protection, respect for the rights of minority groups, and tolerance for diversity in the school curricula through resolutions.  Across the region, parliamentarians could also engage in dialogue and exchange of information on resolutions, domestic laws, and results of investigations on human rights protection, laws against genocide and mass atrocity crimes, as well as education and training for incoming legislators on human rights and civilian protection. 

Some of the important issues raised during the meeting include: 1) protection of minority groups, women, and children in conflict areas of Myanmar/Burma, including the Rohingyas in Rakhine state; 2) the limitations of the UN and ASEAN human rights mechanisms in addressing and responding to human rights problems in the region; and 3) the need to explore alternative venues for addressing human rights violations and mass atrocity crimes in Southeast Asia.  Of particular interest to some parliamentarians in the seminar were cases filed in other countries against former heads of government for human rights violations during their tenure (e.g., in Spain against Pinochet of Argentina; and in Hawaii, USA against Marcos of the Philippines) and what other parliaments/states can do to support not only the prevention of mass atrocity crimes occurring in other countries but in prosecuting the perpetrators of these crimes.  Beyond advocacy, education, and building awareness about R2P and prevention of atrocity crimes, a number of parliamentarians stressed the need to implement the norm and respond more effectively to ongoing human rights violations and atrocity crimes happening in the region. 

To read more see: Prevention of Atrocity Crimes in the ASEAN region: the Role of Parliamentarians, Spotlight on R2P